Property Law

Commercial landlords and tenants be aware –  compulsory no access clauses are near

No access in emergency clauses have been a hot topic for most landlords and tenants since NZ’s first level 4 lockdown last year. Clause 27.5 of the ADLS Deed of Lease is likely the more discussed clause in leases in the last 18 months.

During NZ’s level 4 lockdown in 2020, it became apparent that some leases had a clause (a “no access in emergency” clause) which enabled “locked down” tenants to claim a reduction on rent and outgoings for the period that they could not access their premises. The reduction was to be a “fair proportion” agreed between the parties. Other, older or non-ADLS leases did not have such a clause and some landlords refused a rent reduction to their tenants on the basis that the lease did not provide for that.

The Government have recently released COVID-19 Response (Management Measures) Legislation Bill which proposes to change this position, in response to ongoing lockdown restrictions. This Bill proposes to amend the Property Law Act 2007 to include an implied covenant in commercial leases for no access in emergencies – similar to, but not the same as clause 27.5 “no access in emergency” clause of the ADLS Deed of Lease.

In brief terms, the proposed changes will require leases which do not have a “no access in emergency” clause in them, to have one implied. This implied clause provides that a “fair proportion” of rent will cease to be payable for the period that a tenant cannot access their premises from 28 September 2021 onwards. A topic of heated debate last year was around what a “fair proportion” is for a tenant who cannot use their premises while in lockdown. The Bill does not specific what a “fair proportion” of rent, but does include some factors to be considered.

The law changes provide that, if landlord and tenant agree, they can exclude or vary this implied covenant from their leases, but must do so by written agreement. The changes are also proposed to be retrospective, which means that, if this Bill becomes law in its current form, all current leases subject to the Property Law Act and new leases in future will be subject to this implied covenant, unless the parties specifically agree otherwise.

There are also proposed new requirements for disputes to go to arbitration. This is obviously an attempt to keep landlord and tenant disputes out of Court, but it has been noted that arbitration takes time and it costly, so this may not be a practical solution in many cases.

Commercial landlords and tenants should keep these proposed changes in mind and review their lease arrangements in the coming months.

Contact our team for further information.

Brooke Courtney

Share
Published by
Brooke Courtney
Tags: COVID-19

Recent Posts

Team members step up Sharp Tudhope

We're pleased to announce the promotion of four members of our legal team. Benji Crossley…

9 hours ago

Tariff cease-fire: a breather for New Zealand exporters – but no time to relax.

Since our last update on US tariffs, there have been several significant developments unfold in…

1 month ago

Incorporated Societies: Countdown to Re-Registration Under the 2022 Act

What you need to know about updating your constitution and meeting the deadline As most…

2 months ago

Financial Markets Authority submissions: clarifying the use of Eligible Investor Certificates

Eligible Investor Certificates: High Court Submissions and Key Implications In recent submissions made to the…

3 months ago

Competition Law Review: Submissions on the Commerce Act 1986

Modernising Competition Law: Our Take on the Commerce Act Review The Ministry of Business, Innovation…

3 months ago