Trust Law

Trust Law Update – The Case of the Missing Beneficiary

The recent case of The Estate of Thomas Winston Hodgson highlights changes under the new Trusts Act and what the Court will deem ‘reasonable measures’ when trying to find missing beneficiaries.

In this article we explore your responsibilities under the Trusts Act 2019 when a beneficiary cannot be found.

Brief history – Thomas Winston Hodgson died on or about 10 June 2021 leaving a Will. The beneficiaries under that Will were his 3 children. One of the children, the applicant and administrator of the Will, applied to the Court to distribute the funds in the estate to two of the three children. They did this as they could not ascertain the whereabouts of their brother, who they had not seen or heard from for more than twenty years. They had published advertisements in Australian newspapers, as they believed that was where he resided with the following wording:

“ESTATE OF THOMAS WINSTON HODGSON of Whangarei in New Zealand – The lawyers acting for the above estate are seeking the whereabouts of KEVIN THOMAS HODGSON. You, or any person claiming through you. Please contact us and/or send notification of any claim on or before 15 January 2021″.

Section 136 of the Trusts Act 2021 replaced Section 76 of the Trustee Act 1956. Section 76 set out a process for trustees to follow where beneficiaries cannot be ascertained. This included publishing such advertisements as necessary and waiting a requisite 2 months before taking any further action. The New Zealand Law Commission described Section 76 as a “long and impenetrable provision” and recommended a more flexible approach to enquiries to ascertain the existence or whereabouts of missing beneficiaries.

The Court held that wording of the advertisement was not clear enough for Kevin Hodgson, or any of his children, to establish that they may have a potential beneficial interest in the estate. Further they felt in today’s social media world, investigating the missing beneficiaries’ whereabouts through online channels may have proven more fruitful. The Court therefore declined the application to distribute funds in the deceased estate.

It would appear that ‘reasonable measures’, may not cover simply putting an advertisement in the local paper. An advisable approach as a bare minimum, would be a search of social media and advertising in these forums to try and find the beneficiaries. Any advertisements that are made need to be clear to ensure that the beneficiary, if found, is aware that they may be a beneficiary under the Will. The applicant(s) will also need to wait for 60 days since the last of the measures were taken before the Court will consider the application.

To find out more, contact our team.

Karla Wyndham-Jones

Share
Published by
Karla Wyndham-Jones

Recent Posts

Sharp Tudhope Welcomes Associate Chrissy Tarrant to the Property Team

Welcome Chrissy We’re pleased to welcome Chrissy Tarrant to Sharp Tudhope’s property team as an…

5 days ago

Changes to the Holidays Act 2003: what this means for employers and employees

Employment Leave Act NZ: Key Changes to Annual Leave, Sick Leave & Public Holidays New…

2 weeks ago

Before You Sign: Common Conditions Every Buyer Should Understand in an Agreement for Sale and Purchase

Understanding conditions in a Sale and Purchase Agreement Buying your first home is super exciting,…

1 month ago

Probate Threshold in New Zealand Increasing to $40,000: What You Need to Know

Probate threshold changes in New Zealand Since 2009, New Zealand has required a formal High…

2 months ago

A Legacy That Took Flight: Ray Shannon’s Butterflies and the Power of Planning Ahead

Not every client’s legacy ends up in a museum. Recently, Matthew and Samantha from the…

2 months ago

Buying property together? Understanding ownership options

Joint Tenants vs Tenants in Common So, you’ve found the dream home, or at least…

3 months ago